A More Precise Becker-Hagens Grid
One of the frustrating things about the Becker-Hagens grid placement is that all the websites that mention this B-H grid use only two decimal places of accuracy for the latitude, and only ONE decimal place for the longitude. A lot of people ask: isn't there a way to "FIX" this? Well one way for some people would be to stop watching all TV, don't eat any meat or animal-based products (including milk & ice cream), and remove all the barriers to your connection with love. And then after several months of withdrawal, undoing several years of being in a mental rut and fighting off negative people you'd hopefully get enhanced vision that would allow you to actually see the grid lines. While that's a great idea, it's hard to get people to change for the better, so let's try plan B.
Mathematically, we can only fix the coordinates for the B-H grid just so far, because of the longitude having only 1 decimal place of accuracy. An analogy would be: You and your buddy Jack go fly fishing up north, and then Jack catches this HUGE WHOPPER OF A FISH in a certain part of a river. And then when Jack goes back to you and shows the large fish, Jack can't remember the cool spot where he caught the fish. This would be frustrating to you if you had to walk 10 miles of river to find that "magic" spot to fish.
The fly fishing analogy is important because that same process is what I have as an AccessXP function to find all 62 nodes of any "B-H type" grid. It looks like this:
NewGrid(Jack's latitude, Jack's longitude, Jack's direction of casting)
Now Jack's direction of casting his fishing line is called the Heading, in degrees from 0 to 360. So if Jack stays in the same place and goes BIZZZZ! and casts his line in a different direction, you'll end up with a different set of lines.
So then we can fix the latitude of the B-H grid at least, if we put Jack
at the North Pole. Jack's casting direction is a heading of 184.8 degrees
for this B-H grid. So I ran this function:
Becker-Hagens grid= NewGrid(89.999999,0,184.8)
(note
to self: use heading of B-H line 61-to-20)
Keep in mind: temporarily you need to be a smidgen off of the north pole, to make the trigonometry work. That's okay, because we know the new longitudes will STILL only be one decimal of accuracy. I fixed these longitudes for you.
So after many years, here's a more accurate list of nodes for the Becker-Hagens
grid in three different formats:
BHnodesFixed.txt (decimal degrees only,
West & South are negative)
BHnodesFixedDM.txt (degrees & minutes)
BHnodesFixedDMS.txt
(degrees, minutes, and seconds)
Remember: what got improved was only the
latitude.
At my site, the "Blue Grid" lines are drawn with this function:
NewGrid(76.34523333,
-139.9321694, 180.433560132521)
The position of these Blue Grid lines works
well for many areas of the world, but I've got another proposal for the B-H
grid...
Having a B-H grid line run between nodes 09 & 18 at a longitude of 76.8 may not be perfectly accurate. The people of Trout Run, Pennsylvania tell stories about Route 15 on the west side of town, where cars keep dying (most likely due to strong earth energies). And with the Blue Grid, Trout Run residents don't get to have any grid line nearby. Trout Run's longitude may not mean much to a lot of people, but it will when I tell you the longitude of Trout Run is about -77.055618, which lines up perfectly with the White House in Washington DC. Actually it lines up with some landmark called ZERO MILESTONE just south of the White House. So with the B-H grid line longitude being at -76.8, moving this line more WEST would help. On top of that moving the grid line over the White House would put a grid line almost right on top of the Pentagon.
There's also B-H node 44, which is just east of St. Mary's Peak near the town of Hawker, Australia. If the node is a smidgen east of this peak, moving the node MORE WEST would help, right? Then there's the Oregon Vortexin the US, with a B-H grid line just to the east. If only the grid line there were a teensy bit more WEST...
So I have a Proposal #1 for the B-H grid: move the longitude of the nodes west by 0.255618 degrees. Then the new node 20 would be 26.57,-5.055618. The new heading from node 61 (North Pole) to node 20 is 185.055616638284. So this new B-H Proposed Grid #1 is calculated with: NewGrid(89.999999,0,185.055616638284)
And here are the 62 nodes of this B-H Proposed #1 grid:
BHnodesProposed1.txt
(decimal degrees only, West & South are negative)
BHnodesProposed1DM.txt
(degrees & minutes)
BHnodesProposed1DMS.txt (degrees, minutes, and seconds)
With this Proposed #1 grid, Node 44 in Australia is now more west, and thus closer to St. Mary's Peak. That's a good thing, right? And now the grid line between nodes 09 & 18 is right over the White House, and runs over Trout Run, PA right near Route 15, where all the cars keep dying. I can also show you grid maps of this Proposed #1 grid with the extra EarthStar lines added. See http://www.vortexmaps.com for the EarthStar idea. And with this grid shifted to the west, there is a grid line running through Mecca now.
Some people dance to the beat of a different drum, so you end up meeting them halfway and try playing their tune, to maybe learn something new about the world.